
- Trainer PPs
- Sire PPs UPDATED
Saratoga: 2025 Birdstone Stakes Analysis, Predictions, Free PPs
- Updated: August 6, 2025

Today’s race of the day is the 2025 Birdstone Stakes, a 1¾-mile dirt race for four-year-olds and upward at Saratoga, and features a competitive field of six horses. Using free past performances and experienced handicapping prowess, we’ve analyzed the contenders based on their Composite Ratings, Performance Ratings, Pace Benchmarks, and other key metrics such as running style, trainer/jockey stats, and recent form. Below is a detailed handicapping analysis, the Angle Picks prediction, and wagering strategy for the race.
Race Overview
- Distance: 1¾ miles (Dirt)
- Purse: $150,000
- Field Size: 6 horses
- Pace Benchmarks: Early Speed (First Call: 91, Second Call: 97), Final Speed (89, 97)
- Key Factors: Stamina, early speed, and ability to handle off tracks (Saratoga’s dirt can be variable in August. Check the weather at Saratoga). The long distance favors horses with proven staying power and tactical speed to maintain position.
Contender Analysis
1. Strapped (15/1)
- Composite Rating: 131.5 (6th)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 102, 2025: 102, 2024: 99
- Running Style: Presser
- Recent Form: Strapped has shown improvement in 2025, winning three of seven starts, including two allowance races at Aqueduct. His last race (July 26, 2025, Saratoga, OC100k) saw him finish fourth, improving late but never threatening. His best Performance Rating (102) ties for the fastest in the field, but his recent form against weaker competition and poor trainer win percentage (3% at the meet) are concerns.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (83/91 in last race) suggest he lags early but has a decent Final Speed Metric (85). He’s unlikely to lead but could close if the pace is hot.
- Strengths: Tied for top dirt Performance Rating (102), consistent in-the-money finishes (47% career).
- Weaknesses: Poor trainer meet stats (1-39), never a threat in last race, and low Composite Rating.
- Trainer/Jockey: Rudy Rodriguez (3% meet win rate) and Luis Saez (15% win rate) are solid but not elite in this context.
2. Parchment Party (7/5)
- Composite Rating: 139.3 (2nd)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 103, 2025: 103, 2024: 89
- Running Style: Stalker
- Recent Form: Won the Grade 3 Belmont Gold Cup (1¾ miles, June 6, 2025) at Saratoga on a sloppy track, showing stamina and a strong rally (Final Speed Metric: 96). His 103 Performance Rating in that race is the highest in the field’s last race. However, he hasn’t raced in 61 days, which could affect sharpness.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (89/105) indicate he can sit off the pace and close strongly, ideal for this distance. His stalker style suits the race’s expected moderate pace.
- Strengths: Proven at the distance and track (1-1 at Saratoga), high Composite Rating, strong trainer (Bill Mott, 13% meet win rate) and jockey (John Velazquez, 12% win rate).
- Weaknesses: Layoff of over two months could dull form.
- Trainer/Jockey: Mott and Velazquez are a top-tier combination, with a 25% win rate together in the last 60 days.
3. Game Warden (9/2)
- Composite Rating: 134.8 (5th)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 103, 2025: 103, 2024: 102
- Running Style: Early-Presser
- Recent Form: Third in the Isaac Murphy Marathon (1½ miles, April 30, 2025) at Churchill Downs, showing stamina but fading late. His 2025 form (1-1-1 in three starts) is solid, and he’s 2-3 at Saratoga, including an allowance win last year. His Performance Rating of 103 at Oaklawn (March 28, 2025) ties for the field’s best.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (92/87 in last race) suggest he can press or lead, which is advantageous in a race lacking dominant front-runners. His Final Speed Metric (86) is adequate but not exceptional.
- Strengths: Tied for top dirt Performance Rating (103), strong Saratoga record, hot jockey (Ricardo Santana Jr., 19% meet win rate).
- Weaknesses: Over three-month layoff, poor trainer record in non-graded stakes (10% wins).
- Trainer/Jockey: Norm Casse (20% meet win rate) and Santana are a strong pair, especially with routes.
4. Lambeth (5/2)
- Composite Rating: 140.2 (1st)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 106, 2025: 106, 2024: 88
- Running Style: Front-Runner
- Recent Form: Won the Temperance Hill (1½ miles, March 28, 2025) at Oaklawn, posting a field-high 106 Performance Rating on a good track. His last race (June 14, 2025, Churchill Downs, 1⅜ miles, turf) saw him fade to fourth, but returning to dirt should help. He’s untested at Saratoga but has the highest Composite Rating.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (82/88 in last race) indicate he’ll likely set or press the pace, which could be key in a small field. His Final Speed Metric (86) suggests stamina limitations.
- Strengths: Top Composite Rating, top dirt Performance Rating (106), high-percentage trainer (Joe Sharp, 30% meet win rate) and jockey (Jose Ortiz, 23% win rate).
- Weaknesses: 53-day layoff, unproven at Saratoga, faded in last race.
- Trainer/Jockey: Sharp and Ortiz are a potent combination, with a 27% win rate together in the last 60 days.
5. Time for Trouble (12/1)
- Composite Rating: 135.8 (4th)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 102, 2025: 93, 2024: 102
- Running Style: Stalker
- Recent Form: Third in the Temperance Hill (March 28, 2025) behind Lambeth and Game Warden, but his Performance Ratings have declined in 2025 (best: 93). He pulled up in last year’s Birdstone Stakes, raising concerns about his ability at this distance. His best dirt Performance Rating (102) is competitive but not elite.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (77/76 in last race) suggest he’ll sit mid-pack, with a Final Speed Metric (101) indicating closing ability. However, he struggles to sustain his run at longer distances.
- Strengths: Drops in class, decent closing kick, trainer Jeff Hiles has a 12% win rate in 2025.
- Weaknesses: Poor 2025 form, pulled up in this race last year, low Performance Ratings relative to top contenders.
- Trainer/Jockey: Hiles (0% meet win rate) and Jose Lezcano (10% win rate) are not inspiring in this context.
6. Digital Ops (3/1)
- Composite Rating: 138.4 (3rd)
- Performance Ratings: Career: 101, 2025: 101, 2024: 97
- Running Style: Front-Runner
- Recent Form: Second in an optional claimer (July 12, 2025, Saratoga) with a 101 Performance Rating, losing as the favorite. His form is consistent (2-2-0 in nine starts), but he’s unproven at this distance. His Saratoga record (0-1-0 in three starts) is a concern.
- Pace Profile: Early Speed Metrics (91/97 in last race) suggest he’ll vie for the lead with Lambeth, setting up a potential duel. His Final Speed Metric (100) is strong for shorter routes but untested at 1¾ miles.
- Strengths: High-percentage jockey (Irad Ortiz Jr., 27% win rate), eligible to improve in third start off layoff, strong trainer (Saffie Joseph Jr., 13% meet win rate).
- Weaknesses: Beaten as favorite last time, unproven at the distance, modest Saratoga record.
- Trainer/Jockey: Joseph and Ortiz are a top-tier combination, with a 20% win rate together in the last 60 days.
Pace Scenario
The Pace Benchmarks (Early: 91/97, Final: 89/97) suggest a moderate early pace with a need for stamina late. Lambeth and Digital Ops, both front-runners, are likely to set the pace, with Game Warden pressing close behind. Parchment Party and Time for Trouble will stalk, while Strapped will close from the rear. A potential speed duel between Lambeth and Digital Ops could soften the front end, benefiting stalkers like Parchment Party or Game Warden, who have proven stamina at longer distances.
Top Contenders
- Parchment Party (7/5): His Belmont Gold Cup win at this distance and track, combined with a strong 103 Performance Rating, makes him the horse to beat. His stalker style fits the race dynamics, and Mott/Velazquez are a reliable combination. The layoff is a minor concern, but his class edge and track affinity outweigh it.
- Lambeth (5/2): The top Composite Rating (140.2) and a field-high 106 Performance Rating in the Temperance Hill make him a major threat. His front-running style and high-percentage connections (Sharp/Ortiz) are pluses, but his unproven Saratoga record and recent turf fade raise questions.
- Game Warden (9/2): His Saratoga success (2-3) and early-pressing style make him dangerous, especially if the pace collapses. His 103 Performance Rating is competitive, but the three-month layoff is a concern.
- Digital Ops (3/1): Strong early speed and top connections (Joseph/Ortiz Jr.) make him a contender, but his lack of experience at 1¾ miles is a significant hurdle.
Prediction
Parchment Party is the most likely winner. His proven ability at this distance and track, combined with a favorable stalker style and strong connections, gives him the edge in a race where stamina is critical. Lambeth’s speed and class make him a threat, but his unproven Saratoga record and potential for a pace duel with Digital Ops could compromise his chances. Game Warden is a solid backup if Parchment Party underperforms off the layoff.
Predicted Finish: 2-4-3-6 (Parchment Party, Lambeth, Game Warden, Digital Ops)
Wagering Strategy
- Win Bet: $10 on Parchment Party (2) at 7/5 or better. His class and distance aptitude make him a strong anchor.
- Exacta Box: $5 on 2-4 (Parchment Party and Lambeth). This covers the two highest-rated horses with complementary running styles.
- Trifecta Key: $1 key 2 / 3-4-6 (Parchment Party over Game Warden, Lambeth, Digital Ops). This targets the top stalker and front-runners for second and third.
- Superfecta Key: $0.10 key 2 / 3-4-6 / 3-4-6 / 1-3-4-5-6. This low-cost play includes Strapped and Time for Trouble for fourth, hedging for an upset.
- Daily Double: $2 on 2 / ALL in Race 8. Parchment Party is a strong single to start the double, maximizing coverage in the next race.
Total Wager: $22.10
Disclaimer: Gambling involves risk. Bet responsibly. Picks are based on free past performances handicapping, historical data, and our proprietary algorithm. TheFreePPs.com provides links to publicly available racing data and is not affiliated with linked sites. All wagering should be done responsibly. TheFreePPs.com is not responsible for losses incurred using this information.